Publications
| Año | Publication | Reference |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 |
A RANDOMIZED CLINICAL TRIAL COMPARING DORNIER P-TM:YAG LASER TO TFL LASER FOR STONE DUSTING ABLATION EFFICIENCY
|
McDermott JT, Sheetz TJ, Berger JH, Finegan JL, Blake R, Bajakian T, Bechis SK, Monga M, Sur RL. (2026) A RANDOMIZED CLINICAL TRIAL COMPARING DORNIER P-TM:YAG LASER TO TFL LASER FOR STONE DUSTING ABLATION EFFICIENCY. J Urol 215, e488. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.JU.0001191404.60845.a4.17 |
| 2026 |
High-power holmium laser versus pulsed thulium laser for ureteroscopic lithotripsy: Results of a randomized prospective study
|
Salvadó JA, Villena JM, Urrea F, et al. High-power holmium laser versus pulsed thulium laser for ureteroscopic lithotripsy: Results of a randomized prospective study. Cent European J Urol. 2026; 79: 30-35. |
| 2026 |
Prospective single-center study comparing RealPulse® Thulium:YAG and Holmium:YAG laser enucleation of the prostate
|
Allaeys, C., Cornette, J., Lambert, E. et al. (2026) Prospective single-center study comparing RealPulse® Thulium:YAG and Holmium:YAG laser enucleation of the prostate. World J Urol 44, 80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-025-06156-5 |
| 2026 |
All about pulsed thulium:YAG laser: a systematic review from YAU Endourology and EAU Endourology
|
Robesti, D., La Rezza, S., Traxer, O., et al (2025) All about pulsed thulium:YAG laser: a systematic review from YAU Endourology and EAU Endourology. Current Opinion in Urology, 36(1):p 57-65, DOI: 10.1097/MOU.0000000000001351 |
| 2026 |
Advances in biliary stone management: Latest-generation extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy vs laser lithotripsy for difficult bile duct stones
|
Srinivas G, Reddy DN, et al. Advances in biliary stone management: Latest-generation extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy vs laser lithotripsy for difficult bile duct stones. World J Gastroenterol. 2026;18(2). DOI: 10.4254/wjh.v18.i2.113464 |
| 2026 |
Does size matter? Comparison of miniaturized (22 Fr) versus standard (26 Fr) instruments in pulsed thulium:YAG laser enucleation of the prostate
|
Ozsoy AF, Maras ME, Sahin YH, et al. (2026) Does size matter? Comparison of miniaturized (22 Fr) versus standard (26 Fr) instruments in pulsed thulium:YAG laser enucleation of the prostate. World J Urol 44, 83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-026-06204-8 |
| 2026 |
Switching lasers: assessing the learning curves of surgeons with different levels of surgical experience when switching from HoLEP to pulsed Thulium:YAG lasers for ThuLEP
|
Stadelmeier LF, Berger L, Nicola P, et al. (2026) Switching lasers: assessing the learning curves of surgeons with different levels of surgical experience when switching from HoLEP to pulsed Thulium:YAG lasers for ThuLEP. Front Surg 13, 799916. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2026.1799916 |
| 2026 |
Evaluation of the transition from Holmium:YAG to pulsed Thulium:YAG for laser endoscopic enucleation of the prostate and the effect on procedural performance
|
Glienke M, von Bargen MF, Özkan A, et al. (2026) Evaluation of the transition from Holmium:YAG to pulsed Thulium:YAG for laser endoscopic enucleation of the prostate and the effect on procedural performance. Eur Urol Open Sci 85, 111–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euros.2026.01.010 |
E-BOOK
The Art of ESWL
In 1980, Dr. Christian Chaussy introduced ESWL as a non-invasive treatment modality for renal stones. This technology has rapidly evolved into the cornerstone of modern stone management, where it remains today.
The Art of ESWL book by Dr. Tailly and Dr. Parmar offers guidance on improving the general practice of ESWL for better treatment outcomes and reducing the incidence and severity of adverse effects and complications.
We’re here to help.
Have a question about our products and services, or general feedback for us?
We’d love to hear from you. Fill up the form below and our customer representative will get in touch shortly.